Last week I read about Human Resources book. It's written by James Low and T. Siesfield and it called measures that matters. It's about top ten non financial variables that financial analyst counted when judging a corporate quality, an I want to judge myself when i lead PSIK (actually i treated her like a corporate).
no | name | weight | score | totalscore | reason (sorry no table at blogspot)
1. Strategic Corporate executions | 10 | 5 | 50 | only the political aspect and enviromental of the yearly goal that achieved
2. Management Credibility | 9 | 4 | 36 | fairly low since many problems that can't be solved in time, mostly trivial problems
3. Quality of Corporate Strategy | 8 | 9 | 72 | it's PSIK-ITB so my strategic quality is backed-up by the brightest mind
4. Innovation | 7 | 8 | 64 | mostly the opportunity that raised later on is seized perfectly by us :)
5. The ability to attract and keeping the best people | 6 | 10 | 60 | our best people is keeped (such as, bakot, dikdik, teja, gita, hanna, agung), while the rest is dropped out because of academic issues :D
6. Market share | 5 | 6 | 30 | well at least we are counted on west java region :D
7. Management expertise | 4 | 3 | 12 | management theories? go to hell with it :))
8. Stakeholders are compensate equally | 3 | 6 | 18 | only the active ones and the closest friend that is counted by us
9. research leadership | 2 | 9 |18 | innovate along the way dude! most of ground breaking tactics on politic in invented here!
10. Quality of main business process | 1 | 10 | 10 | complaints of the people are received to the top level within 24 hours and the decision on organizational level concluded within 48 hours.
total is 320/55 = total result is 5.81 (fairly low :( )
that's me, how about you? any complaints?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment